or can Mundane become interesting.
I often ponder this question, as some of the photographic work I produce is deemed mundane by others. Consequently, I find myself wondering if such a label is a compliment or an insult – though I must admit, I have yet to reach a conclusion. Regardless of external opinions, however, the fact remains that I genuinely enjoy engaging in this particular type of photography.
Contrary to popular belief, "mundane" does not necessarily equate to "easy." In fact, capturing seemingly ordinary subjects can sometimes prove quite challenging. Interestingly enough, while teaching students about photography projects and their objectives; it's become apparent that there may be instances where one's personal preferences do not align with what would be best suited for the task at hand.
In these situations – which could potentially be seen as hypocritical – my advice tends to lean towards "do as I say rather than as I do." Perhaps navigating through this process oneself is essential before imparting wisdom upon others.
To further understand the role mundanity plays within my craft and its implications on my artistic choices; four key questions arise which demand introspection and honest answers.
1.How would I go about photographing the mundane to considered it interesting
Capturing the essence of the mundane, one seeks to unveil beauty in ordinary objects, scenes or situations that might otherwise go unnoticed. These are some paths that I might follow when photographing life's seemingly insignificant moments:
For me every day holds a hidden treasure of visual poetry. I think why not explore these depths with my camera, allowing the story to unfold like petals on a blooming flower?..: [I know I flow sometimes to much into the romantic side of the blog I should keep focused]
Observe with a fresh perspective: Delve into the detailed dance of life's small wonders, forming patterns that share their secrets with observant eyes. Allow vivid colours to surface from the shadows as textures invite your touch to traverse unexplored realms. Welcome the harmony of nuances humming beneath appearances, ready for unveiling by intrepid souls willing to look beyond ordinary facades. Again this might sound dream like but if you don’t dream images how will you create them in the first place, don’t be afraid to dream them.
Experiment with composition: Experiment with various angles, viewpoints, and framing methods to produce visually captivating images. Seek out leading lines, symmetry, or distinctive perspectives that can enhance the appeal of an otherwise ordinary subject.
Focus on the story: Concentrate on the narrative, [ Narrative even a simple one can bring the image to life] Aim to portray a story or elicit emotions via your photographs. Seek moments that express nostalgia, serenity, or even a touch of humour.
Experiment with lighting: Lighting possesses the power to significantly alter a photograph's mood and impact. To create captivating visuals, experiment with varying lighting conditions – be it gentle natural light or stark shadows.
Use colour and contrast: Take note of the colour palette and contrast within your frame. Eye-catching bursts of colour or striking contrasts can transform even the most ordinary subjects into something remarkable.
The allure of photographing the mundane hinges on one's perspective. Some may appreciate beauty in life's simplicity, while others favour drama or striking visuals. As a photographer, the challenge lies in transforming the ordinary into an engaging experience for your audience.
One of the photographers that I consider to be on the level of greatness would be that of William Eggleston. Eggleston, a photographer that I studied when I first started out in photographery. Back then I never knew about the term of the mundane to me Eggleston was a observer of the world through his documentarian's lens. Capturing subjects from unconventional angles or when they're not looking, he creates an illusion of his own absence. This results in images imbued with heightened intimacy. So a question I ask of his works is.
Image by William Eggleston
2. Is William Eggleston style considered to be mundane photography
I pose this question: if one is influenced by another photographer, does that not simply make them a precursor to oneself? A query nested within another inquiry, I presume. William Eggleston, a pioneer in colour photography, possesses an uncanny ability to unveil the beauty hidden within the mundane. His style frequently showcases ordinary subjects – everyday objects, street scenes, and common people – transforming them into works of artistic merit.
With vivid hues, unique compositions, and scrupulous attention to detail, Eggleston breathes depth and charm into his photographs.
Eggleston's work defies the concept of mundane while pushing traditional photography's limits. Capturing seemingly ordinary moments in an enthralling manner invites viewers to appreciate the beauty and importance of everyday life. Thus, although his subject matter may be deemed mundane, Eggleston's style renders his photography captivating and thought-provoking. Two Sides of Perception
Therein lies one side of the coin. To some, he represents a certain aspect; to others, an entirely different one.
This brings me to another inquiry. If William Eggleston represents the mundane from across the pond, who might be our equivalent on this side?
Image by Martin Parr
3. Which UK photographer would be considered as a mundane photographer
Undoubtedly, the master of mundane photography in the UK is none other than the distinguished Martin Parr. I have previously discussed his remarkable photographic work on this blog and may do so again. One can never cease to benefit from delving into another person's work, as well as one's own.
Take time to revisit your past creations and draw valuable lessons from them.
Martin Parr's photographic work, often associated with capturing the ordinary, is what I find truly captivating. His style uncovers humour and irony in everyday situations, shining a light on the common people and mundane aspects of British culture. Characterised by vibrant colours, bold compositions, and an unassuming approach to documentary photography - his work is nothing short of fascinating.
Parr's photographs typically portray scenes from daily life – beachgoers, vacationers, social events, and commonplace objects. Through his distinctive perspective and keen attention to detail, he unveils the peculiarities of British society. Although the subjects he captures may be deemed mundane at first glance; it's this ability to transform them into engaging and thought-provoking images that has solidified him as one of the most influential photographers in the UK.
4. When would a photograph not be considered as a mundane image
Of all the questions I pose to myself, this proves the most difficult to answer. Why? Mundane is not merely a snapshot taken haphazardly. Instead, it symbolises a carefully considered moment in time with an underlying purpose.
Mundane photography does not capture fleeting moments; rather, one waits with bated breath for that precise instant they know will inevitably occur.
I think that a photograph may not be considered mundane when it captures something extraordinary, unique, or unexpected, a rare or unusual event, a dramatic moment, or a subject that is out of the ordinary. When a photograph elicits a strong emotional response, tells a compelling story, or challenges conventional perceptions, it tends to be seen as more than mundane. but it does depend on your point of view. Would you consider that a wildlife photographer would take a mundane image, would a studio photographer take a mundane image or are all the images that they take extraordinary.What about a habitat image is that mundane after all to the wildlife its a mundane moment is it not.
Additionally, the context in which a photograph is presented can influence whether it is considered mundane. For example, a photograph displayed in an art gallery or accompanied by a thought-provoking narrative may elevate its perceived significance, even if the subject matter itself is mundane. The artistic intent, technical mastery, and the ability to evoke curiosity or engage the viewer's imagination can also elevate a photograph beyond the mundane. Ultimately, the interpretation of a photograph as mundane or not is subjective and can vary based on individual perspectives and cultural contexts.